Auditory Stream Segregation and Selective Attention for Cochlear Implant Listeners: Evidence From Behavioral Measures and Event-Related Potentials

dc.contributor.authorParedes-Gallardo, Andreu
dc.contributor.authorInnes-Brown, Hamish
dc.contributor.authorMadsen, Sara
dc.contributor.authorDau, Torsten
dc.contributor.authorMarozeau, Jeremy
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T02:07:50Z
dc.date.available2018-08-22T02:07:50Z
dc.date.issued2018-08
dc.description.abstractThe role of the spatial separation between the stimulating electrodes (electrode separation) in sequential stream segregation was explored in cochlear implant (CI) listeners using a deviant detection task. Twelve CI listeners were instructed to attend to a series of target sounds in the presence of interleaved distractor sounds. A deviant was randomly introduced in the target stream either at the beginning, middle or end of each trial. The listeners were asked to detect sequences that contained a deviant and to report its location within the trial. The perceptual segregation of the streams should, therefore, improve deviant detection performance. The electrode range for the distractor sounds was varied, resulting in different amounts of overlap between the target and the distractor streams. For the largest electrode separation condition, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded under active and passive listening conditions. The listeners were asked to perform the behavioral task for the active listening condition and encouraged to watch a muted movie for the passive listening condition. Deviant detection performance improved by increasing electrode separation between the streams, suggesting that larger electrode differences facilitate the segregation of the streams. Deviant detection performance was best for deviants happening late in the sequence, indicating that a segregated percept builds up over time. The analysis of the ERP waveforms revealed that auditory selective attention modulates the ERP responses in CI listeners. Specifically, the responses to the target stream were, overall, larger in the active relative to the passive listening condition. Conversely, the ERP responses to the distractor stream were not affected by selective attention. However, no significant correlation was observed between the behavioral performance and the amount of attentional modulation. Overall, the findings from the present study suggest that CI listeners can use electrode separation to perceptually group sequential sounds. Moreover, selective attention can be deployed on the basis of the resulting auditory objects, as reflected by the attentional modulation of the ERPs at the group level.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Oticon Centre of Excellence for Hearing and Speech Sciences (CHESS), the Carlsberg Foundation, the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Early-Career Research Fellowship Grant No. 1069999, and The Marian and E.H. Flack Trust. The Bionics Institute acknowledges the support from the Victorian Government through its Operational Infrastructure Support Program.en_US
dc.identifier.citationParedes-Gallardo, A., H. Innes-Brown, S. M. K. Madsen, T. Dau, and J. Marozeau. 2018. Auditory Stream Segregation and Selective Attention for Cochlear Implant Listeners: Evidence From Behavioral Measures and Event-Related Potentials. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 12(581).en_US
dc.identifier.issn1662-453X
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.bionicsinstitute.org:8080/handle/123456789/314
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers in Neuroscienceen_US
dc.subjectAuditory scene analysisen_US
dc.subjectSegregationen_US
dc.subjectCochlear implanten_US
dc.subjectAuditory attentionen_US
dc.subjectEvent-related potentialsen_US
dc.subjectBuild-upen_US
dc.titleAuditory Stream Segregation and Selective Attention for Cochlear Implant Listeners: Evidence From Behavioral Measures and Event-Related Potentialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2018_ParedesGallardo_Auditory.pdf
Size:
3.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections