Comparing fNIRS signal qualities between approaches with and without short channels

dc.contributor.authorZhou, Xin
dc.contributor.authorSobczak, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Colette
dc.contributor.authorLitovsky, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-08T04:51:06Z
dc.date.available2021-02-08T04:51:06Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.description.abstractFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive technique used to measure changes in oxygenated (HbO) and deoxygenated (HbR) hemoglobin, related to neuronal activity. fNIRS signals are contaminated by the systemic responses in the extracerebral tissue (superficial layer) of the head, as fNIRS uses a back-reflection measurement. Using shorter channels that are only sensitive to responses in the extracerebral tissue but not in the deeper layers where target neuronal activity occurs has been a 'gold standard' to reduce the systemic responses in the fNIRS data from adults. When shorter channels are not available or feasible for implementation, an alternative, i.e., anti-correlation (Anti-Corr) method has been adopted. To date, there has not been a study that directly assesses the outcomes from the two approaches. In this study, we compared the Anti-Corr method with the 'gold standard' in reducing systemic responses to improve fNIRS neural signal qualities. We used eight short channels (8-mm) in a group of adults, and conducted a principal component analysis (PCA) to extract two components that contributed the most to responses in the 8 short channels, which were assumed to contain the global components in the extracerebral tissue. We then used a general linear model (GLM), with and without including event-related regressors, to regress out the 2 principal components from regular fNIRS channels (30 mm), i.e., two GLM-PCA methods. Our results found that, the two GLM-PCA methods showed similar performance, both GLM-PCA methods and the Anti-Corr method improved fNIRS signal qualities, and the two GLM-PCA methods had better performance than the Anti-Corr method.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work was supported by NIH-NIDCD (https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/, R01DC003083 toRL), UW-Madison’s Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, and a Core grant from NIH-NICHD (U54HD090256 to Waisman Center). The sponsors and funders were not involved in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_US
dc.identifier.citationZhou, X., G. Sobczak, C. M. McKay, and R. Y. Litovsky. 2020. Comparing fNIRS signal qualities between approaches with and without short channels. PLoS ONE. 15(12): e0244186.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.bionicsinstitute.org:8080/handle/123456789/414
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPlos Oneen_US
dc.titleComparing fNIRS signal qualities between approaches with and without short channelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020_Zhou_Comparing.pdf
Size:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections