Browsing by Author "Proud, Elizabeth"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Objective evaluation of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease using an inexpensive marker-less motion tracking system
    (IOP Publishing, 2019-01) Lee, Wee Lih; Sinclair, Nicholas; Jones, Mary; Tan, Joy; Proud, Elizabeth; Peppard, Richard; McDermott, Hugh; Perera, Thushara
    OBJECTIVE: Quantification of bradykinesia (slowness of movement) is crucial for the treatment and monitoring of Parkinson's disease. Subjective observational techniques are the de-facto 'gold standard', but such clinical rating scales suffer from poor sensitivity and inter-rater variability. Although various technologies have been developed for assessing bradykinesia in recent years, most still require considerable expertise and effort to operate. Here we present a novel method to utilize an inexpensive off-the-shelf hand-tracker (Leap Motion) to quantify bradykinesia. Approach: Eight participants with Parkinson's disease receiving benefit from deep brain stimulation were recruited for the study. Participants were assessed "on" and "off" stimulation, with the "on" condition repeated to evaluate reliability. Participants performed wrist pronation/supination, hand open/close, and finger-tapping tasks during each condition. Tasks were simultaneously captured by our software and rated by three clinicians. A linear regression model was developed to predict clinical scores and its performance was assessed with leave-one-out cross validation. Main Results: Aggregate bradykinesia scores predicted by our method were in strong agreement (R = 0.86) with clinical scores. The model was able to differentiate therapeutic states and comparison between the test-retest conditions yielded no significant difference (p = 0.50). Significance: These findings demonstrate that our method can objectively quantify bradykinesia in agreement with clinical observation and provide reliable measurements over time. The hardware is readily accessible, requiring only a modest computer and our software to perform assessments, thus making it suitable for both clinic- and home-based symptom tracking.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Objective evaluation of bradykinesia in Parkinson’s disease using an inexpensive marker-less motion tracking system
    (IOP Publishing Ltd, 2019-01) Lih, Wee-Lih; Sinclair, Nicholas; Jones, Mary; Tan, Joy; Proud, Elizabeth; Peppard, Richard; McDermott, Hugh; Perera, Thushara
    OBJECTIVE: Quantification of bradykinesia (slowness of movement) is crucial for the treatment and monitoring of Parkinson's disease. Subjective observational techniques are the de-facto 'gold standard', but such clinical rating scales suffer from poor sensitivity and inter-rater variability. Although various technologies have been developed for assessing bradykinesia in recent years, most still require considerable expertise and effort to operate. Here we present a novel method to utilize an inexpensive off-the-shelf hand-tracker (Leap Motion) to quantify bradykinesia. Approach: Eight participants with Parkinson's disease receiving benefit from deep brain stimulation were recruited for the study. Participants were assessed "on" and "off" stimulation, with the "on" condition repeated to evaluate reliability. Participants performed wrist pronation/supination, hand open/close, and finger-tapping tasks during each condition. Tasks were simultaneously captured by our software and rated by three clinicians. A linear regression model was developed to predict clinical scores and its performance was assessed with leave-one-out cross validation. Main Results: Aggregate bradykinesia scores predicted by our method were in strong agreement (R = 0.86) with clinical scores. The model was able to differentiate therapeutic states and comparison between the test-retest conditions yielded no significant difference (p = 0.50). Significance: These findings demonstrate that our method can objectively quantify bradykinesia in agreement with clinical observation and provide reliable measurements over time. The hardware is readily accessible, requiring only a modest computer and our software to perform assessments, thus making it suitable for both clinic- and home-based symptom tracking. .
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A palm-worn device to quantify rigidity in Parkinson’s disease
    (Elsevier B.V., 2019-02) Perera, Thushara; Lee, Wee-Lih; Jones, Mary; Tan, Joy; Proud, Elizabeth; Begg, Angus; Sinclair, Nicholas; Peppard, Richard; McDermott, Hugh
    BACKGROUND: Parkinsonian rigidity is identified on clinical examination as resistance to passive movement. Measurement of rigidity commonly relies on ordinal rating scales (MDS-UPDRS), however instrumented objective measures may provide greater mechanistic insight. NEW METHOD: We present a palm-worn instrument to objectively quantify rigidity on a continuous scale. The device employs a miniature motor to flex the third digit of the hand about the metacarpophalangeal joint whilst transducers record flexion/extension forces. We aim to determine congruence with the MDS-UPDRS, investigate sensitivity to the impact of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and contralateral movement, and make comparisons with healthy individuals. Eight participants with Parkinson's disease underwent evaluation during conditions: on and off DBS, and with and without contralateral limb movement to activate rigidity. During each DBS condition, wash-in/out effects were tracked using both our instrument and two blinded clinical raters. Sixteen healthy volunteers (age-matched/young) served as controls. RESULTS: Rigidity measured using our instrument had moderate agreement with the MDS-UPDRS and showed differences between therapeutic state, activation conditions, and disease/healthy cohorts. Rigidity gradually worsened over a one-hour period after DBS cessation, but improved more rapidly with DBS resumption. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Previous attempts to quantify rigidity include manual approaches where a clinician is required to manipulate limbs while sensors passively gather information, or large automated instruments to move the wrist or elbow. CONCLUSION: Given its ability to track changes in rigidity due to therapeutic intervention, our technique could have applications where continuous measurement is required or where a suitably qualified rater is absent.