Browsing by Author "Leuenberger, James"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- ItemAn automated system for rapid evaluation of high-density electrode arrays in neural prostheses(Institute of Physics, 2011-06) John, Sam; Shivdasani, Mohit; Leuenberger, James; Fallon, James; Shepherd, Robert; Millard, Rodney; Rathbone, Graeme; Williams, ChrisThe success of high density electrode arrays for use in neural prostheses depends on efficient impedance monitoring and fault detection. Conventional methods of impedance testing and fault detection are time consuming and are not always suited for in-vivo assessment of high density electrode arrays. Additionally the ability to evaluate impedances and faults such as open and short circuits both, in-vitro and in-vivo are important to ensure safe and effective stimulation. In the present work we describe an automated system for the rapid evaluation of high density electrode arrays. The system uses a current pulse similar to that used to stimulate neural tissue and measures the voltage across the electrode in order to calculate the impedance. The switching of the system was validated by emulating a high density electrode array using light emitting diodes and a resistor- capacitor network. The system was tested in-vitro and in-vivo using a range of commercially available and in-house developed electrode arrays. The system accurately identified faults on an 84 electrode array in less than 20 seconds and reliably measured impedances up to 110 kn using a 200µA, 250 µs per phase current pulse. This system has direct application for screening high density electrode arrays in both a clinical and experimental setting.
- ItemEvaluation of stimulus parameters and electrode geometry for an effective suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis(IOP Publishing Ltd, 2010) Shivdasani, Mohit; Luu, Chi; Cicione, Rosemary; Fallon, James; Allen, Penny; Leuenberger, James; Suaning, Gregg; Lovell, Nigel; Shepherd, Robert; Williams, ChrisSeveral approaches have been proposed for placement of retinal prostheses; epiretinal, sub-retinal, and suprachoroidal. We aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of varying a range of stimulus parameters and electrode geometry for a suprachoroidal electrode array, using cortical evoked responses to monopolar electrical stimulation in cats. Our results indicate that charge thresholds were not dependent on electrode size, pulse widths or position of the return electrode tested, but were dependent on the number of sites stimulated in parallel. Further, we found that the combination of monopolar stimulation with large diameter electrodes, wide pulse widths and parallel stimulation minimized the voltage requirements for stimulation. These results provide useful insights for the design specifications of a low voltage suprachoroidal stimulator.