Browsing by Author "Brochier, Tim"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users.
    (Acoustical Society of America, 2017-06) Brochier, Tim; McDermott, Hugh; McKay, Colette
    In order to improve speech understanding for cochlear implant users, it is important to maximize the transmission of temporal information. The combined effects of stimulation rate and presentation level on temporal information transfer and speech understanding remain unclear. The present study systematically varied presentation level (60, 50, and 40 dBA) and stimulation rate [500 and 2400 pulses per second per electrode (pps)] in order to observe how the effect of rate on speech understanding changes for different presentation levels. Speech recognition in quiet and noise, and acoustic amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured with acoustic stimuli presented to speech processors via direct audio input (DAI). With the 500 pps processor, results showed significantly better performance for consonant-vowel nucleus-consonant words in quiet, and a reduced effect of noise on sentence recognition. However, no rate or level effect was found for AMDTs, perhaps partly because of amplitude compression in the sound processor. AMDTs were found to be strongly correlated with the effect of noise on sentence perception at low levels. These results indicate that AMDTs, at least when measured with the CP910 Freedom speech processor via DAI, explain between-subject variance of speech understanding, but do not explain within-subject variance for different rates and levels.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Encoding speech in cochlear implants using simultaneous amplitude and rate modulation
    (Acoustical Society of America, 2018-10) Brochier, Tim; McKay, Colette; McDermott, Hugh
    To improve speech perception for cochlear implant (CI) users, it is essential to improve the transmission of temporal envelopes. The most common speech processors deliver temporal envelopes via the CI using fixed-rate amplitude modulated (AM) pulse trains. Psychophysical studies suggest that rate modulation (RM) and AM are perceived by a shared temporal integration mechanism, but the potential for them to constructively combine to encode temporal envelopes has yet to be explored. In this experiment, a speech processing strategy called amplitude and rate temporal modulation was developed to encode speech temporal envelopes with simultaneous AM and RM. The strategy was tested for perception of clean speech at 60 and 40 dBA, and 60 dBA speech in noise (+10 dB SNR). The amount of RM was varied and the amount of AM was held constant to determine whether the addition of RM could enhance the perception of temporal envelopes and improve speech understanding. At the lowest RM amount, speech scores were poorest for all speech conditions. For 60 dBA clean speech and speech in noise, speech scores were significantly better at the highest RM amounts, suggesting that RM combined with AM can be used to enhance perception of temporal envelopes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users.
    (Acoustical Society of America, 2018-03) Brochier, Tim; McKay, Colette; McDermott, Hugh
    The perception of temporal amplitude modulations is critical for speech understanding by cochlear implant (CI) users. The present study compared the ability of CI users to detect sinusoidal modulations of the electrical stimulation rate and current level, at different presentation levels (80% and 40% of the dynamic range) and modulation frequencies (10 and 100 Hz). Rate modulation detection thresholds (RMDTs) and amplitude modulation detection thresholds (AMDTs) were measured and compared to assess whether there was a perceptual advantage to either modulation method. Both RMDTs and AMDTs improved with increasing presentation level and decreasing modulation frequency. RMDTs and AMDTs were correlated, indicating that a common processing mechanism may underlie the perception of rate modulation and amplitude modulation, or that some subject-dependent factors affect both types of modulation detection.