DSpace

About the Bionics Institute

 

Bionics Institute Research Online >
Bionic Vision >
Bionic Vision Research Publications >


Title: Oculomotor Responses to Dynamic Stimuli in a 44-Channel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis
Authors: Titchener, Samuel
Kvansakul, Jessica
Shivdasani, Mohit
Nayagam, David
Epp, Stephanie
Williams, Chris
Barnes, Nick
Kentler, William
Kolic, Maria
Balin, Elizabeth
Ayton, Lauren
Abbott, Carla
Luu, Chi
Allen, Penelope
Petoe, Matthew
Keywords: Visual prosthesis
Retinal prosthesis
Motion perception
Eye movements
Head movements
Issue Date: Dec-2020
Publisher: tvst
Citation: Titchener, S. A., J. Kvansakul, M. N. Shivdasani, J. B. Fallon, D. A. X. Nayagam, S. B. Epp, C. E. Williams, N. Barnes, W. G. Kentler, M. Kolic, E. K. Baglin, L. N. Ayton, C. J. Abbott, C. D. Luu, P. J. Allen, and M. A. Petoe. 2020. Oculomotor Responses to Dynamic Stimuli in a 44-Channel Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis. Translational Vision Science & Technology. 9(13): 31.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate oculomotor behavior in response to dynamic stimuli in retinal implant recipients. METHODS: Three suprachoroidal retinal implant recipients performed a four-alternative forced-choice motion discrimination task over six sessions longitudinally. Stimuli were a single white bar ("moving bar") or a series of white bars ("moving grating") sweeping left, right, up, or down across a 42″ monitor. Performance was compared with normal video processing and scrambled video processing (randomized image-to-electrode mapping to disrupt spatiotemporal structure). Eye and head movement was monitored throughout the task. RESULTS: Two subjects had diminished performance with scrambling, suggesting retinotopic discrimination was used in the normal condition and made smooth pursuit eye movements congruent to the moving bar stimulus direction. These two subjects also made stimulus-related eye movements resembling optokinetic reflex (OKR) for moving grating stimuli, but the movement was incongruent with stimulus direction. The third subject was less adept at the task, appeared primarily reliant on head position cues (head movements were congruent to stimulus direction), and did not exhibit retinotopic discrimination and associated eye movements. CONCLUSIONS: Our observation of smooth pursuit indicates residual functionality of cortical direction-selective circuits and implies a more naturalistic perception of motion than expected. A distorted OKR implies improper functionality of retinal direction-selective circuits, possibly due to retinal remodeling or the non-selective nature of the electrical stimulation. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Retinal implant users can make naturalistic eye movements in response to moving stimuli, highlighting the potential for eye tracker feedback to improve perceptual localization and image stabilization in camera-based visual prostheses.
URI: http://repository.bionicsinstitute.org:8080/handle/123456789/413
ISSN: 2164-2591
Appears in Collections:Bionic Vision Research Publications

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
2020_Titchener_Oculomotor.pdf2.8 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
View Statistics

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2010  Duraspace -